ONE POWER FEED

After a long career of fighting fires, Doug Corwin joined One Energy to help harness the power of wind.

In today’s edition of Climb to the Top, find out how Doug went from being a firefighter, paramedic, and EMT instructor to One Energy’s Training & Facilities Manager. One Energy is committed to safety, quality, and continued learning – which means Doug has a lot on his plate!

Watch the video below to learn about Doug’s professional journey and why he credits his work ethic for his successful Climb to the Top.

Climb to the Top videos can also be found on our LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter – and be sure to subscribe to our YouTube channel for more One Energy content.

Historically in America, we haven’t liked monopolies very much. In the late 1800s and early 1900s, Congress passed the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act to bar monopolies in the United States. Those laws still exist today. In fact, last week the Federal Trade Commission and 48 state attorneys general sued Facebook alleging antitrust violations under these acts.

So, what’s the big deal? Why do we care so much about monopolies – and why has the U.S. done so much for more than a century to keep them out of our country?

Well, the big deal is that monopolies are toxic. They are toxic to consumers, they are toxic to the economy, and they are toxic to free markets. But to understand why, we need to dive deeper, to look at what a monopoly really is.

Broadly, monopolies are single companies in a market that operate to the exclusion of others. When a monopoly exists, they have no (or practically no) competition. The monopolist can charge any price they want, and we as consumers have to take it. They can supply inferior products, and we have to buy them. They can fail to innovate for decades, and there is nothing we can do about it. All of these issues are toxic for consumers and toxic for the economy. It’s easy to see why America isn’t a big fan.

Yet, despite this country’s distaste for and laws against these toxic practices, we still allow monopolies in an essential industry: electricity. Think about your electric provider. In most states, consumers have no (or virtually no) choice regarding who we buy electricity from. We can either find ways to produce power ourselves, or we buy from our utility. That’s because state governments have drawn geographic regions and given electric utilities the right to supply service to everyone in that area.

How is this legal? Well, state governments allow monopolies in the electricity context. And courts have found that this is legal. In order to make this legal and “okay,” states have established commissions and boards that regulate the type, quality, and price of services that these monopolies offer. This is supposed to protect customers from all the toxic effects of utilities. But let’s face it. No government process is perfect. And so, while these bodies are set up to eliminate (or at least quell) the toxic effects of these monopolies, there is only so much that can be done. A monopoly is going to monopolize. And they are going to keep doing it over, and over, and over again. No matter how toxic the effects.

So, whether you’re a household consumer or an enormous electricity user spending hundreds of millions of dollars on electricity every year, you largely have no choice when it comes to who provides you electricity, or how much you pay. You are a captive customer. And, in some places, utilities even argue you shouldn’t be able to produce your own electricity on site – or hire someone to do it for you.

That is why One Energy, and companies like it, are revolutionizing the electric industry. One Energy gives consumers the ability to generate their own electricity, and helps them understand what they can do to minimize costs and break free from being a captive customer. We are the antidote to the toxic monopoly. That mission is what drives One Energy every day.

Katie Treadway is the Head of Regulatory Affairs at One Energy.

Learn more about Katie and the One Energy team.

I worked for one company who sent out employee cell phone bills every month and made us highlight any personal calls we made, so we could reimburse them. I worked for one company who would not let us have a single stamp to mail a personal letter. I worked for a company who made us cover the alcohol from every receipt on every expense report, no matter the quantity or purpose. I worked for a company who charged us to use the company printer.

As an employee, I didn’t get it. As an executive… I understand it even less!

There are three reality checks executives need:

1. Employees will always win in the tit-for-tat game, if they want to.
2. Your employees make far bigger decisions for the company than the cost of a stamp (or even a bottle of wine).
3. Employees who know that you care for (and trust) them will return the favor tenfold.

It really is that straightforward.

From a pure capitalist point of view, the math is simple. If you make a $60,000/year employee track down their own 55-cent stamp, then you’re going to lose value from them. They are going to make time to mail that stamp, and that is time they could have spent doing better work for you. I would much rather my employee take 10 stamps and work an extra 5 minutes because they don’t have to leave early to make it to the post office. Hell, I don’t even want them thinking about the damn inconvenience of a stamp during the workday.

My job as an executive is to enable my employees to be as effective as possible for the company. My job is to remove unnecessary clutter so they can complete as much high-value work for me as possible.

Of course I want to be the kind of boss that I would want to work for. But, I also want to be the kind of executive that maximizes the value of his employees to the company. In this case, both qualities conveniently align.

Companies that nickel and dime employees over small stuff are sending the wrong message. They are not saying “respect the company’s resources,” as they purport. They are saying “$1 in cash to the company is worth more than $50 of your time.” Employees know the difference.

You trust your employees to do the big stuff. My team makes decisions about life-and-death engineering, complex accounting, and millions of dollars every day. If I need to demand that they pay me for the soda in the fridge, then I sure as hell shouldn’t be letting them make the bigger decisions that really matter for the company.

I have a duty to make their workday simple. I view it this way: a $75k/year employee costs $288 a day based on a 260-day work year (in my dreams). If I can spend $10 a day making them more productive, it will cost an extra $2,600 a year (a 3.4% burdened cost). If that employee is just 5% more efficient, the company made a killing.

The reality is that when you make it easy to work for you, employees are far greater than 5% more valuable (and productive). When they can grab a soda, mail an envelope, print their kid’s homework report, and have a glass of wine at dinner during a 3-hour layover in the Atlanta airport, without thinking about reimbursement, they know that you care about them. They know that you believe their time is valuable.

And when times get tough (and they will), and you’ve spent the last several years treating employees like humans and valuing their time, they’ll be there for you – even if you can no longer afford those little luxuries.

When things almost went off the cliff for us as a company last year, everyone that we asked to stay with us did (even when all logic said they shouldn’t). And when people asked me why they stayed with us, I told them: our employees know that I care about them, and in turn they care about this business. It is simple.

Jereme Kent is the CEO of One Energy.

Learn more about Jereme and the One Energy team.